Botulism Scare? New Zealand Yawns

(Originally published here.)

One would be forgiven for thinking that China’s recent decision to ban imports of whey proteins and milk powders produced by Fonterra Cooperative Group — after discoveries of bacteria associated with botulism — would have a big impact on New Zealand’s economy. After all, Fonterra is one of New Zealand’s biggest companies, responsible for sourcing and distributing almost all domestic dairy products in the country. Those dairy products account for about a quarter of New Zealand’s exports, which in turn make up about a third of the country’s gross domestic product.

Intriguingly, yesterday’s trading suggests that investors aren’t worried about the ban. Yes, the New Zealand dollar briefly dropped against the Australian dollar, but the 12-month pattern is unmistakable:

New Zealand dollar v. Australia dollar, August 2012 - Present. Source: Bloomberg

New Zealand dollar v. Australia dollar, August 2012 – Present. Source: Bloomberg

The New Zealand stock market has also been little changed, even though Fonterra alone accounts for 1.4 percent of the total value of New Zealand’s benchmark stock index. The chart below compares the price of New Zealand shares against Australian ones:

New Zealand All Ordinaries Index v. ASX 200 Index, August 1 = 100. Source: Bloomberg

New Zealand All Ordinaries Index v. ASX 200 Index, August 1 = 100. Source: Bloomberg

Most striking is the performance of Fonterra shares themselves. After initially plunging by almost 9 percent, they ended the day down only 3.7 percent. That’s certainly undesirable from the perspective of shareholders but not what you would expect if the company’s future were imperiled.

Fonterra share price. Source: Bloomberg

Fonterra share price. Source: Bloomberg

One explanation is that the ban is temporary and will be lifted once the contaminated batches of product have been identified and destroyed.

More generally, I think that New Zealand’s resilience and, in particular, the 14 percent rise in the kiwi dollar against the aussie over the past year, is a reflection of the island nation’s position as a food exporter. Like Australia (and countries such as Brazil), New Zealand has done well over the past decade by selling commodities to rapidly growing China. Unlike Australia, which depends on Chinese demand for industrial products such as iron ore, coal, and copper, New Zealand sells milk and meat.

Australia had the edge when China was willing to spend as much as half of its GDP on infrastructure projects of dubious value. Over the past year, however, traders seem to have concluded that New Zealand is the better long-term bet as China’s economy moves away from excessive investment and devotes more resources to the needs of consumers. This makes sense. Middle-income countries ought to care more about quality baby formula than bridges to nowhere. The stock market’s modest reaction to the botulism scare suggests that traders think New Zealand will benefit from this shift more than its larger Anglophone neighbor.

(Matthew C. Klein is a writer for Bloomberg View. Follow him on Twitter.)

Advertisements

About Matthew C. Klein

I write about the economy and financial markets for Bloomberg View. Before that I wrote for The Economist on a fellowship provided by the Marjorie Deane Financial Journalism Foundation. I have worked at the world's largest hedge fund and read every FOMC transcript since May, 1987.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s